<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Ethical Considerations When Treating Patients with Schizophrenia</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.innovationscns.com/ethical-considerations-when-treating-patients-with-schizophrenia/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.innovationscns.com/ethical-considerations-when-treating-patients-with-schizophrenia/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=ethical-considerations-when-treating-patients-with-schizophrenia</link>
	<description>A peer-reviewed journal providing evidence-based information</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 29 Oct 2011 23:55:49 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Naomi Pinson</title>
		<link>http://www.innovationscns.com/ethical-considerations-when-treating-patients-with-schizophrenia/comment-page-1/#comment-594</link>
		<dc:creator>Naomi Pinson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Oct 2008 12:33:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.innovationscns.com/ethical-considerations-when-treating-patients-with-schizophrenia/#comment-594</guid>
		<description>I am interested as to why the authors chose to ignor the longitudinal studies that have been done worldwide that point to the fact that schizophrenia is something that people recover from. Also, many studies now indicate that early intervention helps to mitigate or stop the full blown syndrome. Curious. As someone who works in human rights I see the lack of informed consent as a legal as well as an ethical issue. While a dimenishment of cogition is often concomittent with symptoms it may not be, and often is not until the illness is well advanced. It does seem to me that by not giving informed consent that doctors collude with paranoia, as well as breaking the law and codes of ethics.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am interested as to why the authors chose to ignor the longitudinal studies that have been done worldwide that point to the fact that schizophrenia is something that people recover from. Also, many studies now indicate that early intervention helps to mitigate or stop the full blown syndrome. Curious. As someone who works in human rights I see the lack of informed consent as a legal as well as an ethical issue. While a dimenishment of cogition is often concomittent with symptoms it may not be, and often is not until the illness is well advanced. It does seem to me that by not giving informed consent that doctors collude with paranoia, as well as breaking the law and codes of ethics.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

